Legal Opinion
Conerly v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided March 20, 2018No. 18-310Published
1Opinion of the Court
ffii],n:i fi\uui ru,qL @nitoU Stute B {.outt otfrlrrul @luims No. l8-0310C Filed: March 20,2018 FILED MAR 2 0 2018 SUAMINKA CONERLY. U.S. COURT OF FEDERAL CIAIMS Plaintiff, Pro Se; Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction; In Forma Pauperis Application 'THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. ORDER SMITH, Senior Judge On February 27,2018, plaintiff, proceedingpro se, filed a complaint in this Court and concunently filed an informa pauperis application seeking leave to proceed without paying the Court filing fee. Plaintiff alleges that her civil rights were violated and is seeking $900 tdllion in damages. I.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Treviño v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Waltner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.