Legal Opinion

Federal Surety Co. v. Ragle

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1930No. 12256PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

This suit was instituted by the appellant surety company against the appellee W. E. Ragle to set aside an award of the Industrial Accident Board for 100 weeks compensation for the loss of the sight of an eye. Briefly staged, the evidence shows that appellee was employed by Shaw & Rathke, alleged to be a copartnership engaged in the business of producing oil and gas, and who were subscribers under the Workmen’s Compensation Act with the appellant Federal Surety Company; that appellee was a foreman for Shaw & Rathke, who were engaged in drilling an oil well on a farm some six miles from the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Wabash Railway Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Consolidated Underwriters v. SaxonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Petroleum Casualty Co. v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Federal Surety Co. v. RagleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  2. Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kent v. National Supply Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API