Legal Opinion

Mulartrick v. Heimbecker

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County

Decided October 2, 1996No. 95-12208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

TRESSLER, J.,

— Defendants, Gerard and Susan Heimbecker, appeal from this court’s order dated July 2, 1996, granting plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions in the form of a default judgment. Their appeal raises a single issue: whether this court properly granted plaintiffs a default judgment as a sanction for defendants’ repeated violations of the rules of discovery and court orders regarding discovery.

FACTS

On June 16, 1995, plaintiffs filed their complaint in the above-captioned matter. They served their first set of interrogatories and first request for production of documents upon defendants’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steinfurth v. LaMannaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. v. DinelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. v. DinelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Borough of Kennett Square v. LalCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Musumeci v. Penn's Landing Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heimbecker v. Drudge, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API