Legal Opinion

Musumeci v. Penn's Landing Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1994No. 03531, 03532, 03556, 03557, 03603PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The issue we decide, inter alia, is whether delay damages pursuant to Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 238 are recoverable in a case under the federal maritime law. We hold that Rule 238 damages are not recoverable.

This appeal involves the claim of Ann Musumeei for injuries sustained when the ramp used to exit a cruise ship collapsed, and the claim of her husband, Salvatore, for loss of consortium. The defendants, Penn’s Landing Corporation, Chandris S.A., and Ajax Navigation Corporation, conceded liability, and the Musumecis’ lawsuit was consolidated for trial on the issue of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Thomas Carey v. Bahama Cruise LinesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Okkerse v. HoweSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Earl E. Robinson v. Pocahontas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1973
  5. Poleto v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Hammons, P. v. Ethicon, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Bunting v. Sun Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Mulartrick v. Heimbecker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API