Legal Opinion

Heaney v. Riddle

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1941No. Appeal, 296PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

In 1916 Henry J. Heaney, plaintiff, gave his bond to Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Company, Trustee, in the principal sum of $15,000, payable at the expiration of five years, secured by a mortgage on premises 219 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, of which he was then the owner. In 1919 he conveyed the premises to The Riddle Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, under and subject to the mortgage. In 1928 The Riddle Company filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County a petition for dissolution, giving notice of the application by advertisement in two…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. May's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Fair Oaks Building & Loan Ass'n v. KahlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Faulkner v. McHenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Gaskins v. BonfilsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Smith v. Great Basin Grain Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Levitt v. PatrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan (In Re Kaplan)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Masgai v. MasgaiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Carlos R. Leffler, Inc. v. HutterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API