Legal Opinion

May's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 6, 1907No. Appeal, No. 258PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal, No. 258, Jan. T., 1906, by Celia May, from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., April T., 1905, No. 734, sustaining exceptions to adjudication in Estate of Simon May, deceased. Exceptions to adjudication. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in sustaining exceptions to adjudication.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Elkin,

The first question to be determined on this appeal is whether this court has jurisdiction to entertain it. At the audit of the account filed by the executors of the decedent a claim was presented by Charles F. Millett amounting to $2,706.01, with interest. The auditing judge disallowed the claim, but the court in banc, on exceptions filed, reversed the auditing judge and awarded the amount of the claim to the appellee. The *67appellant, a legatee under the will of her deceased husband, is only entitled to receive one-third of his personal estate, which would be less…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. King v. Mount Vernon Building Assn.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. Merriman v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Campbell v. ShrumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
  4. Blood v. Crew Levick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Moore's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Dobkin v. LandsbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Fair Oaks Building & Loan Ass'n v. KahlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Heaney v. RiddleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Faulkner v. McHenrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  5. Schuetz's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API