State v. Southall
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted in the district court for Ramsey county for grand larceny in tbe first degree. The case was tried before Brill, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict of guilty; and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The defendant was indicted, tried, and convicted, under G. S. 1894, § 6709, subd. 1, of grand larceny in the first degree, committed by means which, prior to the adoption of the penal code, was designated as obtaining money, etc., by false pretenses. This subdivision, together with the preceding and closing parts of the section, which are applicable to both subdivisions, reads, so far as here material, as follows:
“A person who, with the intent to deprive or defraud the true owner of his property, or of the use and benefit thereof, or to appropriate the same to the use of the taker, or of any…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HennSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. ComingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mathews v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- State v. JansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- State v. FootMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. Van RuschenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.