Legal Opinion

State v. Briggs

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1906No. 14,762PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Crawford district court; Arthur Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

B. F. Briggs was convicted "of obtaining money from Henry Mattox by means of false and fraudulent pretenses. In the information it was charged, in substance, that Briggs represented that he was a loan agent, engaged in loaning money on real estate; that he was financially responsible and worth from $45,000 to $60,000; that he had under his control $500,000 to loan upon farms, and that he would make Mattox a loan of $3000 on his farm, at an interest rate of five per cent, and a. commission of $120, one-half of which was to be paid at…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. People v. . PeckensNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Farmer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Crum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. HensslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PrepSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. People v. WhalenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. GermainOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State v. HandkeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API