David v. Hett
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Biles, J.:
This dispute questions whether the economic loss doctrine, which began as a prohibition against certain product liability *680actions, extends to tort claims brought by homeowners against residential service contractors for poor workmanship. The district court and Court of Appeals applied the doctrine and dismissed the homeowners’ negligence theories. But we hold the doctrine should not apply. Our existing caselaw establishes that homeowners’ claims against residential contractors may be asserted in tort, contract, or both, depending on the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- National Credit Union Administration Board v. Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Rinehart v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Simmons v. PorterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Cash & Carry America, Inc. v. Roof Solutions, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.