Graff v. Boise Cascade Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Chief Justice:
Plaintiffs brought this action for the purpose of invalidating a mechanic’s lien claimed against their property. Both sides moved for summary judgment and the trial court ruled in favor of defendant, concluding that the notice of intention to claim a lien which was recorded by defendant was in substantial compliance with statutory requirements.
The facts are not in dispute. At the time defendant filed the notice of lien, Roncor, Inc., was the record owner of the property. However, plaintiffs were the equitable owners as evidenced by an agreement that was subsequently made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- H.A.M.S. Co. v. Electrical Contractors of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- First Security Mortgage Co. v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1981
- Chase v. DAWSON ET UX.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
- Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
- In Re WilliamsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
- First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. StylerDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1992
- Mickelsen v. Craigco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.