Legal Opinion

Chase v. DAWSON ET UX.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1950No. 7363PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Defendants appeal from a district court judgment whereby a materialman’s lien was foreclosed. There is no dispute as to the fact that the materials were actually furnished and were used on the premises in construction of a house, and that defendants are the owners for whom the house, was built. The sole question for review relates to the legal sufficiency of the notice of lien.

Appellants contend that the notice of lien does not comply with section 52-1-7, U. C. A. 1943, and that such notice is fatally deficient for failure to state: (a) The nature and amount of the material…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrison, Merrill & Co. v. WillardUtah Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Projects Unlimited, Inc. v. Copper State Thrift & Loan Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1990
  2. VCS, Inc. v. La Salle Development, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Graff v. Boise Cascade Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Pearson v. LambCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API