Legal Opinion
Boeing Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 3, 1992No. 92-14CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This action, brought pursuant to the Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”),1 is before the court on the government’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The substance of the motion is that there was no actual or deemed final decision by the contracting officer on a claim by Boeing, nor was there at any time a government claim that could be appealed. After oral argument, and for the reasons set forth below, the court concludes that the motion should be granted.
Factual Background
On February 25, 1985, Boeing was awarded Contract F19628-85-C-0046, the Prime Mission…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mother's Restaurant Incorporated v. Mama's Pizza, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Seaboard Lumber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company, and Tenneco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Al Munford, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Peterson Builders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Boeing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992