Legal Opinion

Godley v. North River Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1935No. 24346PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. In the absence of an express stipulation in an insurance policy that the furnishing of a notice, or a proof, of loss within the time specified shall be a condition precedent to a recovery, a provision merely that no suit shall be brought on the policy unless all of its requirements have been complied with will not bar an action where the insured failed to furnish the notice or proof within the time required, provided that he did so within a reasonable time after the loss, and in accordance with any other provisions in the policy fixing the beginning of liability at a specified time after…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Southern Fire Insurance v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Harp v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Sentinel Fire Insurance v. McRobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  4. North American Accident Insurance v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Pilgrim Health & Life Insurance v. ChismCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. Burrell Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Theo v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  3. Buffalo Insurance Co. v. SteinbergCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Johnson v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  5. Parris v. Great Central InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API