Legal Opinion

Twin City Fire Insurance v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1933No. 22319PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

In an action on a fire-insurance policy Mrs. Willis Wright recovered a verdict and judgment against Twin City Fire Insurance Company for $1,051.30 fire loss and $100 attorney’s fees. By exceptions pendente lite the insurance company raises the question whether the trial judge erred in denying its motion for a continuance, based upon the absence of a witness. The other questions for consideration are presented by the motion for a new trial.

By paragraph the substance of the petition is as follows:

1. Defendant is a foreign corporation with an office, agent, agency, and place of business in…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Athens Mutual Insurance v. EvansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Central Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Gate City National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  4. Queen Insurance v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Cannon v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. BoneyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  3. Firemen's Insurance v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API