People v. Curtis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea of guilty or to vacate the judgment convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]) and thus failed to preserve for our review his contention that the plea allocution was factually insufficient to establish a sale of the controlled substance (see, People v Crooks, 278 AD2d 931, Iv denied 96 NY2d 782). Defendant’s further contention that the plea colloquy was insufficient to establish that the crime occurred in Livingston County relates to venue…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. HansenNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- People v. CrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BuccinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. HadfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. MacDonaldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. HadfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.