People v. Greenberg
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Kaye.
An offense committed on board a common carrier may be prosecuted in any county through which the carrier passed during the trip (CPL 20.40 [4] [f]). Does this statute allow de fendant to be tried in New York County for offenses committed on a commuter train from Westchester to New York County, where it is undisputed that the offenses took place wholly in Westchester? We conclude that New York County was a proper place of trial.
In March 1993, defendant boarded a Metro-North commuter train to New York City in Westchester County. He displayed a weekly pass to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. RibowskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. McLaughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People of the State of New York v. . DowlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- People v. TulloNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. CarvajalNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- People v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Cornell v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- People v. CornellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.