Legal Opinion
Saunders v. Mullen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 1911No. 2453PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Error from District Courts Stephens County; ■Prank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by J. S. Mullen and others against S. E. Saunders and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of defendants -in error to dismiss the appeal, based upon several grounds, one of which, at least, we think is well taken. The third ground for dismissal is that:
“This court is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal, for the reason that all the parties against whom judgment rendered in the trial court have not been made party plaintiffs in error on appeal.”
The record shows that judgment was rendered below against S. F. Saunders, A. O. Mallory, Cassie Pritchard, D. L. Brewer, T. Maynard, J. H. Jennings, and Newt Singleton, O. M. Nichols,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6 of Caddo CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Seibert v. First Nat. Bank of OkeeneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- John v. PaullinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Vaught v. Miners' Bank of JoplinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- May v. FitzpatrickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Smith v. J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Seton v. HudsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912