Legal Opinion

John v. Paullin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 14, 1909No. 202PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error from District Gourt, Bryan County; Malcolm E. Rosser, Judge. Action by Louis Paullin against the Choctaw-Chickasaw Investment Company and others, in which action Hagon John, guardian, intervened. Judgment for plaintiff as against inter-vener, and intervener brings error.

Read the full summary

Error from District Gourt, Bryan County; Malcolm E. Rosser, Judge. Action by Louis Paullin against the Choctaw-Chickasaw Investment Company and others, in which action Hagon John, guardian, intervened. Judgment for plaintiff as against inter-vener, and intervener brings error. This proceeding is from a judgment of the district' court of Bryan county, in an action wherein defendant in error, Louis Paullin, was plaintiff, and the Choctaw-Chickasaw Investment-Company, a corporation, Elmer Williams, Eli P. Williams, Charles H. Williams, A. P. Banks, Tom Anderson, —— Maddox, and - Thomas were…

1Opinion of the Court

Hayes; J.

(after stating the facts as abov.e). Intervener filed his petition in error in this court, and plaintiff, as one of the defendants in error, entered his general appearance within one 3rear after the rendition of judgment in the lower court, but no summons in error was issued and served upon any of the defendants, nor .did any of them enter a general appearance 'in this court within one year from the rendition of the judgment. Defendant in error, plaintiff below, now moves the court to dismiss the proceeding, upon the ground that all the necessary parties had not been brought into…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strange v. CrismonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Board of County Commissioners v. HarveySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  3. West v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Davis v. ElliottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Moss v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Essex Storage Electric Co. v. Victory Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  2. St. Louis, S. F. R. Co. v. HoustonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Holland v. BeaverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Pioneer Canal Co. v. AkinWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API