Legal Opinion
Crandall v. Starbucks Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 5, 2017No. Case No.15-cv-01828-JSCPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff Craig Crandall, an individual who requires a wheelchair for mobility, sues for disability discrimination in eonnection with access barriers he encountered when visiting a Starbucks cafe in San Jose, California. In his First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Plaintiff alleges that Defendant violated the Americans with Disabilities Act: of 1990 (“ADA”), the Unruh Act, and the California Health and Safety Code. (Dkt. No. 37.1) Now pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Concentrated Phosphate Export Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Blair v. Barrett Financial Group LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- CHAITRAM v. PENN MEDICINE PRINCETON MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Garcia v. Quong Fook TongDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Gastelum v. HEES IIDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Gastelum v. Pinnacle Hotel Circle LPDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.