Legal Opinion
Edward Albert Gioiosa v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 9, 1982No. 82-1077PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
Edward Albert Gioiosa appeals the district court’s denial, 525 F.Supp. 1241, of his motion pursuant to the federal habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate a conviction. Gioiosa’s conviction was based on his plea of guilty made to a charge of knowingly and intentionally possessing with intent to distribute and distributing a quantity of a Schedule IV controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) 1 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. 2 Some of the facts of this case are set out in United States v. One 1974 Porsche 911-S, 682 F.2d 283, also decided today. In his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donald Milton Orand v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Bruce A. Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Keith A. Mira v. Ronald C. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Extradition of Curtis Andrew Howard. United States of America v. Curtis Andrew HowardCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Cyrus Jonathan GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. One 1974 Porsche 911-S Vehicle Identification No. 9114102550Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.