Legal Opinion

Seltzer v. Chadwick

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1946No. 30046PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, C. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover a fee he alleges was earned by him while serving as attorney for- an administrator (defendant) of an estate which was probated in Kodiak, Alaska. Trial of the cause to the court without a jury resulted in findings that the services had been performed by a partnership consisting of an attorney named Warren A. Taylor and plaintiff, and that plaintiff, who had retired from the partnership and assigned his interest in the firm to his surviving partner prior to the commencement of the action, had no right to maintain the action in his individual capacity.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stetson & Post Mill Co. v. McDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Seidell v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dew v. PearsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Yarbrough v. PughWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Western Lumber & Pole Co. v. JoslynWashington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beckman v. WilcoxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Cheesman v. SathreWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Lieberman v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. BP Land & Cattle, L.L.C. v. Balcom & Moe, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Peck v. Better Business Standards Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API