Legal Opinion
Seidell v. Taylor
Washington Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1915No. 12517PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Benton county, Holcomb, J., entered May 11, 1914, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plain tiffs, in an action for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
This is an action for damages, claimed as the result of the defendants’ wrongful act causing the loss of the plaintiffs’ business to them. The trial in the superior court resulted in verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiffs for the sum of $750, from which the défendants have appealed.
The nature and ground of respondents’ claim is set forth in their complaint, after alleging their partnership, as follows :
“That on or about the first day of December, 1912, the plaintiffs herein leased from the defendants a sales room, bake room and bake oven and purchased the equipment and business of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Davies v. Rose-Marshall Coal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by14 opinions
- Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- Cherberg v. Peoples National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- City of Seattle v. BlumeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Clark v. FiggeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Caruso v. Local Union No. 690 of International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.