Legal Opinion

Stetson & Post Mill Co. v. McDonald

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1893No. 653PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

This case was brought by the appellant to foreclose a lien for lumber furnished to be used in the construction of a building erected on certain real estate in the city of Seattle, in which the respondent Rengstorff had a leasehold interest. McDonald and Docking were partners engaged in the business of constructing buildings, and en-. tered into the contract with Rengstorff for the construction of this building. Piper and Sweeney had no actual part in the construction of the building, but were sureties for the contractors; although, instead of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gates v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Hildebrandt v. SavageWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Cox v. SternIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Hill v. Alliance Building Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Pineland Lumber Co. v. RobinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Smith v. AllenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Turner v. St. JohnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API