Kay v. Hanover Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
GLASSMAN, Justice.
Hanover Insurance Company appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Androscoggin County, Calkins, J.) on a jury verdict awarding damages to Edwin Kay and Arvilla Kay on their complaint against, inter alia, Hanover for injuries suffered as a result of an automobile accident involving Edwin. Hanover contends that the trial court’s admission of certain medical testimony proffered by the Kays is reversible error and that the evidence submitted to the jury is insufficient to support its verdict. We affirm the judgment.
The record reveals the following undisputed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HebertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
- State v. RomanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Hatch v. Maine Tank Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sipes v. General Motors Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1997
- State v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
- Waterville Industries, Inc. v. Finance AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- In Re Breauna N.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Maine Shipyard & Marine Railway v. LilleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.