Legal Opinion

Waterville Industries, Inc. v. Finance Authority

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 27, 2000PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] The Finance Authority of Maine (FAME) appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Marden, J.) 1 in favor of Waterville Industries, Inc. The judgment reflects a jury’s determination that FAME breached the purchase and sale contract it had with Waterville Industries for the purchase of a mill in Waterville, and it subjects FAME to pay $150,000 in damages as well as further damages to be determined in the future. FAME contends (1) that the contract merged into the deed conveying the mill, barring claims for breach of the contract; (2) that the action is barred…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Atascadero State Hospital v. ScanlonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Currier v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Norton v. Town of Long IslandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. Drees Co. v. OsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2003
  3. Johnson v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. Halco v. DaveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Darling'sSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API