Legal Opinion

In Re Breauna N.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 20, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRudman, J.

[¶ 1] Breauna’s mother and her grandfather appeal from an order entered by the District Court (Portland, Bradley, J.) terminating the mother’s parental rights pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. §§ 4055(B)(2)(a), 4055(B)(2)(b)®, and 4055(B)(2)(b)(ii) (1992 & Supp.1998). They argue that the court erred when it found by clear and convincing evidence: (1) that the mother was unwilling and unable to take responsibility for and protect Breauna from jeopardy in a time reasonably calculated to meet Breauna’s needs; and (2) that the termination of her parental rights was in Breau-na’s best interest. The mother…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Commissioner of the Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  2. In Re Alexander D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. In Re Denise M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. In Re David H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  5. Kay v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re Thomas H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  2. In Re Charles G.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  3. In Re Kayla M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  4. In Re Kayla S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2001
  5. In re Child of Sherri Y.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API