In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appellant challenges the termination of her parental rights, arguing that (1) she rebutted the statutory presumption that she is palpably unfit, (2) the county failed to develop a case plan and make reasonable attempts to reunite appellant with her child, and (3) the record does not show that it is in the child’s best interests to terminate appellant’s parental rights. We affirm.
FACTS
While this case concerns the termination of appellant D.D.’s parental rights to D.L.R.D., her fourth child, D.D.’s actions regarding the first three children born to her are relevant. In…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Welfare of A.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In re Welfare of J.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.