Legal Opinion

In Re the Welfare of D.L.R.D.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 2003No. C3-02-972PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WRIGHT, Judge.

Appellant challenges the termination of her parental rights, arguing that (1) she rebutted the statutory presumption that she is palpably unfit, (2) the county failed to develop a case plan and make reasonable attempts to reunite appellant with her child, and (3) the record does not show that it is in the child’s best interests to terminate appellant’s parental rights. We affirm.

FACTS

While this case concerns the termination of appellant D.D.’s parental rights to D.L.R.D., her fourth child, D.D.’s actions regarding the first three children born to her are relevant. In…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Matter of Welfare of ClausenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Matter of Welfare of ChosaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. In Re the Welfare of A.D.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of the Child of T.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  2. In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  4. In Re the Welfare of the Child of D.L.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  5. In re Welfare of J.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API