Legal Opinion

In re Welfare of J.W.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 2011No. A11-814PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

Kandiyohi County petitioned to terminate J.W.’s parental rights to a newborn daughter, K.W., on the ground that J.W. is palpably unfit to be a party to a parent-child relationship. At trial, the county relied primarily on the statutory presumption that a parent is palpably unfit if his or her parental rights to one or more other children previously were involuntary terminated. J.W. introduced the testimony of 15 witnesses, including her own testimony, in an attempt to show that her parenting skills have improved such that she no longer is palpably unfit. But the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  4. In Re the Welfare of P.R.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  5. In Re the Welfare of S.Z.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Quiana M. B. v. State Department of Family ServicesNevada Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. In re Welfare of K. L. W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
  4. In the Matter of the WELFARE OF the CHILD OF R.D.L. and J.W., ParentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  5. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API