Legal Opinion

Vaulx v. Tennessee Central Railroad

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1907PublishedCited by 19 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Davidson County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals. — John W. Childress, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This is a condemnation proceeding. The railroad company appropriated, as its right of way, 9.12 acres *318of land out of-a tract of 205 acres owned by the plaintiffs in error. There were appropriate proceedings instituted in the court below for the ascertainment of the value of the land appropriated and incidental damages. The only question before us now arises out of certain language used by the circuit judge in disposing of the motion for new trial, and next as to whether the circuit judge acted correctly in giving certain instructions to the jury, and in declining other instructions which were…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. SmithwickTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Tennessee Coal & Railroad v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Wray v. Knoxville, LaFollette & Jellico RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Jenkins v. HankinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. BancorpSouth Bank, Inc. v. HatchelCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. Morton Butler Timber Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
  3. Curran v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Allen v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936
  5. James E. Strates Shows, Inc. v. JakobikTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API