Legal Opinion

Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Smithwick

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 73 opinions

PROM WILSON. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Wilson County. — ■ James A. Jones, Special Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The substance of the declaration in this case was that the defendant below had stored in its building a large quantity of dynamite; that this building was located in a thickly settled part of the town (Lebanon) ; that it stood near a building occupied by plaintiff; that on a certain night in January, 1901,' a fire broke out in a building near to that occupied by defendant below, and near to that occupied by the plaintiff in error; that the inhabitants of the town were out in force for the. purpose of extinguishing the fire, with suitable apparatus for- the purpose, and would have succeeded in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tennessee Coal & Railroad v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Railroad v. NeelyTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Jenkins v. HankinsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Railway Co. v. MahoneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Turner v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. State v. MoatsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Foster v. Amcon International, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Davis v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API