Wray v. Knoxville, LaFollette & Jellico Railroad
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Knox County. — ■ Joseph W. Sneed, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes
This is a proceeding to condemn lands for railroad purposes under the exercise of the power of eminent domain. The case has so far proceeded that the matter now in controversy is the compensation to be paid for the land taken and the damages to the remainder of the two separate lots involved.
The jury returned a gross verdict for the appellants, Wray and wife, for $1,575, and they have appealed to this court and assigned errors which Avill all be disposed oí in a general way.
The property sought to be appropriated is a part each of two vacant lots in Darner on’s addition to Knoxville, fronting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Alloway v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
- McKinney v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
- Rochester & Syracuse Railroad v. BudlongNew York Supreme Court · 1854
- Kirkpatrick v. KirkpatrickTennessee Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by27 opinions
- Haynes v. Cumberland Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Indian Creek Marble Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
- Lebanon & Nashville Turnpike Co. v. CrevelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1929
- Lewisburg & N. R. v. HindsTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. Livingston Limestone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.