Legal Opinion
Arneson v. W. H. Barber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1941No. Nos. 32,718, 32,797PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Two cases are here for review (Nos. 32,718 and 32,797). Since the solution of the problems involved in the one is determinative of the other, only one opinion need be written.
Plaintiff as a taxpayer brought this suit for an accounting of moneys collected by defendant for gasoline excise taxes from retailers to whom it had sold gasoline, and for judgment on behalf of the state for the amount found to be due. Defendant’s demurrer was sustained. Thereupon the state took over the laboring oar by filing its complaint in intervention seeking for the same reasons the relief…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- C. Thomas Stores Sales System, Inc. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Studebaker Corp. of America v. GilchristNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- State v. Standard Oil Co. of LouisianaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- State v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hickok Oil Corp. v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1943
- Amoco Corp. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Gleason v. GearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Hallett Construction Co. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.