Evans v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICT OF OMAHA
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
This appeal is from the sustaining of the motion of Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha, hereinafter referred to as MUD, for summary judgment determining LB 425 (Laws 1967, c. 47, p. 178), to be invalid and unconstitutional. The original action was brought by plaintiff Evans as a ratepayer of MUD for a declaratory judgment of the constitutionality of LB 425, which bill amended section 14-1041, R. R. S. 1943, and created section 14-1042, R. R. S. 1943. For the purposes of this opinion LB 425 will be used to refer to the above sections. LB 425 requires MUD to pay 2 percent of its gross…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United Community Services v. Omaha National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Nelsen v. TilleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Rein v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Peterson v. HancockNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Elmen v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mid-South Indoor Horse Racing, Inc. v. Tennessee State Racing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
- State v. NealNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
- Bruno v. Metropolitan Utilities Dist.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Mayhew Products Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Sanitary & Improvement District No. 65 v. WefsoNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.