Legal Opinion

Bundy v. State

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2015No. 2014-0189PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.

{¶ 1} This case arises from a civil action by appellee, David Bundy, seeking a declaratory judgment that he was a “wrongfully imprisoned individual” within the meaning of R.C. 2743.48. Bundy claims eligibility, as a wrongfully imprisoned individual, to seek compensation from appellant, the state of Ohio, for the prison time he served before the reversal of his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender pursuant to our decision in State v. Bodyke, 126 Ohio St.3d 266, 2010-Ohio-2424, 933 N.E.2d 753. The issue presented in this appeal is whether the invalidation of a statute on…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re VonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. Megarry, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Adams County2018
  3. Martin v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Jackson v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. State v. NashOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API