Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State, 08ca009452 (4-20-2009)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 20, 2009No. 08CA009452UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

INTRODUCTION

{¶ 1} Ronald Brooks, Abraham Bowen, Jeffrey York, and Steve Keller have challenged the constitutionality of the Adam Walsh Act amendments to Chapter 2950 of the Ohio Revised Code, also referred to as the Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Law. The Petitioners have argued that the new law is unconstitutional as applied retroactively to those who were first classified under an earlier version of the law. The trial court held that the residency restrictions of the Adam Walsh Act are unconstitutional and that denying indigent offenders appointed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HaydenOhio Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Sexual-Offender Reclassification CasesOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. OrtizOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API