George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COOK, Justice.
This case presents the question whether a pleading containing a claim for usurious interest is a document which may charge interest for purposes of imposing usury penalties. We hold that a pleading asserting a claim for prejudgment interest for a period when no interest is due does not constitute a “charge” of usurious interest for purposes of the Texas usury statute.
Carpet Services, Inc. was a sub-contractor of the George A. Fuller Company of Texas, Inc. on a commercial construction project. After Fuller refused to pay for work completed by Carpet Services, Carpet…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Northwest National Bank of Fort WorthTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Murray v. O & a Express, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Gibraltar Savings, Cross-Appellant v. Ldbrinkman Corp., Cross-Appellee, and Lloyd D. Brinkman, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Moore v. Sabine National Bank of Port ArthurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Aguiar v. Segal, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005
- Federal Savings & Loan Insurance, Receiver of Americity Federal Savings Bank v. Nicholas K. KraljCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Hunt v. Baldwin, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
- Hoxie Implement Co., Inc. v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2001
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.