Legal Opinion

Federal Savings & Loan Insurance, Receiver of Americity Federal Savings Bank v. Nicholas K. Kralj

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 17, 1992No. 91-2841PublishedCited by 104 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

After Nicholas K. Kralj defaulted on a promissory note, Americity Federal Savings Bank brought suit to recover amounts due. Americity then moved for summary judgment. Kralj argued that the promissory note was usurious on its face and that the pleadings should have been amended to reflect a reduction in the debt resulting from the foreclosure of the property secur ing the promissory note. The district court granted Americity’s motion for summary judgment. Finding no error, we affirm the district court’s summary judgment.

I

The facts of this case are uncontested.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Susan Waltman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Odie Joe Reid v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Riverside National Bank v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by104 opinions

  1. First State Bank v. KeilmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Rakestraw v. Carpenter Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1995
  3. Thrift v. Estate of HubbardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  4. Moore v. Carroll County, Miss.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
  5. Hare v. City of Corinth, Miss.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1993

99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API