Legal Opinion

Danziger v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'n

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1987No. C-5308PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUZY, Justice.

The opinion and judgment of April 8, 1987 is withdrawn and the following is substituted therefor.

This is a usury suit. Joseph and Judith Danziger brought an action against their lender, San Jacinto Savings Association, claiming various actions by San Jacinto constituted usury and, further, that San Jacinto had violated the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act and Regulation Z. In a bench trial, the court held that San Jacinto had not contracted for, charged, or received usurious interest nor had it violated the Federal Truth-In-Lending Act or Regulation Z, and rendered judgment that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mary S. Smith v. Don Chapman, D/B/A Don Chapman Motor SalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Houston Sash and Door Co., Inc. v. HeanerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Edwin Grant and Lauretta Grant Johnson v. Imperial Motors, Nathaniel Johnson v. Imperial Motors, Johnnie Mae Gordon v. Backus Cadillac-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. First State Bank of Bedford v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Gibraltar Savings, Cross-Appellant v. Ldbrinkman Corp., Cross-Appellee, and Lloyd D. Brinkman, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Wayne Ventling v. Patricia M. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance, Receiver of Americity Federal Savings Bank v. Nicholas K. KraljCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Phillips v. BramlettTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API