Legal Opinion

Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1993No. D-1349PublishedCited by 243 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOGGETT, Justice.

This construction contract dispute involves multiple issues regarding damages under the agreement and whether the anti-usury provision of the Texas Constitution, article XVI, section 11, applies to the rate of judicially ordered prejudgment interest.

I

In a judgment awarding Northdale Construction Company damages against Sage Street Associates arising from breach of a construction contract, the trial court provided for six percent (6%) prejudgment interest. In its affirmance, the court of appeals reformed the judgment to reflect prejudgment interest of ten percent (10%).…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  5. R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by243 opinions

  1. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Lenape Resources Corp. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996

238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API