Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOGGETT, Justice.
This construction contract dispute involves multiple issues regarding damages under the agreement and whether the anti-usury provision of the Texas Constitution, article XVI, section 11, applies to the rate of judicially ordered prejudgment interest.
I
In a judgment awarding Northdale Construction Company damages against Sage Street Associates arising from breach of a construction contract, the trial court provided for six percent (6%) prejudgment interest. In its affirmance, the court of appeals reformed the judgment to reflect prejudgment interest of ten percent (10%).…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- R & P Enterprises v. LaGuarta, Gavrel & Kirk, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by243 opinions
- Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Spencer v. Eagle Star Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Barker v. EckmanTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Lenape Resources Corp. v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
238 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.