Pender v. Bank of America Corp.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Bank of America (“BoA”) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For reasons given below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED as to Count I and Count III, and DENIED as to Count IV.
BACKGROUND
This action arises from the organization and administration of the BAC Plan, and transactions between that plan and the BoA 401(k) Plan (“the 401(k) Plan”).
I. Retirement Plans in General
This case deals with some of the most complicated aspects of employee pension plans, which warrants a brief overview of how these plans function.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ACOSTA v. SCHWABDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Chelko v. JF Restaurants, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019
- Design Gaps, Inc. v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
- FRANKLIN v. DUKE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Hamrick v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.