Legal Opinion

Pender v. Bank of America Corp.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided December 7, 2010No. 3:05-cr-00238PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Bank of America (“BoA”) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. For reasons given below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED as to Count I and Count III, and DENIED as to Count IV.

BACKGROUND

This action arises from the organization and administration of the BAC Plan, and transactions between that plan and the BoA 401(k) Plan (“the 401(k) Plan”).

I. Retirement Plans in General

This case deals with some of the most complicated aspects of employee pension plans, which warrants a brief overview of how these plans function.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edwards v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ACOSTA v. SCHWABDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Chelko v. JF Restaurants, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019
  3. Design Gaps, Inc. v. HallDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
  4. FRANKLIN v. DUKE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
  5. Hamrick v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API