Legal Opinion
Cement & Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund v. Ulico Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 25, 2006No. 05-6518-cvPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
The Cement and Concrete Workers District Council Pension Fund, along with its trustees (collectively, the “Fund”), appeals the district court’s decision dated September 13, 2005 granting the motion of defendant Ulico Casualty Company (“Ulico”) for summary judgment and dismissing the Fund’s complaint. We assume knowledge of the facts and procedural history of the case and refer to them only for convenience.
The gravamen of the Fund’s complaint is that, under the terms of an insurance policy with a $10-million coverage limit that became effective on April 1, 1999 (the “Policy”),…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Servidone Construction Corp. v. Security InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Allianz Insurance Company v. Regina LernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa. v. The Stroh Companies, Inc. And the Stroh Brewery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Federal Insurance v. International Business MacHines Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Janese v. FayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- United National Insurance v. Granoff, Walker & Forlenza, P.C.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- FRANKLIN v. DUKE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2024
- Genao v. RuizDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.