Legal Opinion
United States v. Angelo Decarlo, in No. 18705. Appeal of Daniel Cecere
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 4, 1972No. 18705, 18706PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
Following a three week jury trial, Angelo DeCarlo and Daniel Cecere1 were convicted of violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 892, 894, prohibiting extortionate credit transactions, and they appealed. The original argument of the appeals was on December 4, 1970 and the opinion of the panel was handed down on August 5, 1971. As a result of a petition for rehearing, arguments were submitted to the Court en banc.
The points raised present vexing questions whether certain testimony, admitted into evidence as part of the government’s case, should have been excluded and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Perez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. John J. SweeneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. NataleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. James Russell, AKA Gaith Junior Douglas, AKA Steven Shawn Jones, James Russell, A/K/A Steven Shawn JonesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. The Southland Corporation and S. Richmond Dole and Eugene Mastropieri, the Southland Corporation, Eugene MastropieriCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Louis Nakaladski, A/K/A Louis Nash, Ettore Coco, A/K/A Eddie CocoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Richard DevincentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.