Price v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
Did the conduct of the prosecutor in calling the witness to the stand, though he knew that the fifth amendment would be invoked, constitute prejudicial error warranting a new trial?
Rogers, McLaughlin, and the defendant herein, Price, were all codefendants, but a motion for severance and separate trial was granted. Both Rogers and McLaughlin testified at the preliminary examination. Shortly before the trial began, apparently on the very morning of trial, McLaughlin’s attorney told the prosecutor that his client would invoke his fifth-amendment privilege and refuse to testify. Shortly after the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Giles v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Namet v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. HutnikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. FeltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Ocanas v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CydzikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.