Legal Opinion
Square D Co. v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 23, 1954No. 13315PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOSCINSKI, District Judge.
This suit was filed under the provisions of Title III, Sec. 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, popularly known as the Taft-Hartley Act, Title 29 U.S.C.A. § 185.
Plaintiff is a Michigan Corporation which, according to allegations in its complaint, is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of electrical equipment and parts for similar equipment manufactured and processed by others throughout the country; some of its products are utilized by various departments of the Government, such as the Corps of Engineers and the Atomic Energy Commission, and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Indianapolis v. Chase Nat. BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Indianapolis v. Chase National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Amazon Cotton Mill Co. v. Textile Workers UnionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Schatte v. International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees and Moving Picture MacHine Operators of United States and CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Proctor v. ApplegateDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
- McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Signal-Stat Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Local 475, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- International Union, United Automobile Aircraft, Etc. v. Benton Harbor Malleable IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1957
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.