Rebney v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BENSON, Acting P. J.—
I. Introduction
This appeal by Manuel Glenn Abascal challenges an allocation of attorney fees upon settlement of class action litigation arising from the assessment of various checking account fees by Wells Fargo Bank, N. A., and Crocker National Bank. We previously affirmed a judgment approving the settlement in Rebney v. Wells Fargo Bank (1990) 220 Cal.App.3d 1117 [269 Cal.Rptr. 844], In the present appeal we hold that on a motion for attorney fees in class action litigation, the trial court need not issue a statement of decision under Code of Civil Procedure…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Rebney v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Mandel v. LacknerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Wershba v. Apple Computer, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Yield Dynamics, Inc. v. TEA Systems Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- California Grocers Assn. v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Jonathan Vo v. Las Virgenes Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.