Legal Opinion
Mandel v. Lackner
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1979No. Civ. 42070PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RATTIGAN, Acting P. J.
This is the second appeal taken by the captioned state officers in this action. The first one was from a judgment in favor of respondent which we affirmed on its merits. (Mandel v. Hodges (1976) 54 Cal.App.3d 596 [127 Cal.Rptr. 244, 90 A.L.R.3d 728].) Among other things, that judgment (1) enjoined the Governor from continuing the practice of ordering the closure of state offices on the religious holyday of Good Friday, between noon and 3 p.m., upon the ground that the practice violated constitutional proscriptions involving the treatment of religion by government…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Mandel v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- American City Bank v. ZetlenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Press v. Lucky Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
- Gorman v. Tassajara Development Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Mandel v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.