Connick v. Hill
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This is an appeal by the administrator of the above-entitled estate and other blood relatives of the decedent from a decree of partial distribution.
Stephen Hill and Isabella Hill were husband and wife. On December 25, 1906, the former died intestate, leaving separate and community property. He left neither, issue nor descendants thereof, nor father nor mother. His surviving blood relatives consisted of two brothers, one sister, and the descendants of two predeceased brothers and one predeceased sister. In the estate of Stephen Hill the court decreed that the estate of Isabella Hill was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Estate of WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Brenham v. StoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- In Re Estate of BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Blood Relatives of Hill v. Blood Relatives of HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Randall v. Department of InstitutionsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of BevilacquaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re the Estate of McArthorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Estate of MercerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.