Legal Opinion
Gross v. Hale-Halsell Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 20, 2009No. 08-5028PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants, all former employees of Hale-Halsell Company (HHC), appeal the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee HHC on their claim that HHC violated the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act), 29 U.S.C. § § 2101-2109. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Background
The WARN Act imposes a federal mandate on employers requiring 60 days advance notice to employees of a plant closing or a mass layoff. Frymire v. Ampex Corp., 61 F.3d 757, 764 (10th Cir.1995); see also 29 U.S.C. § 2102(a); 20…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. Sybase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Frymire v. Ampex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- T-Mobile Central, LLC v. Unified Government Wyandotte County KsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Local Union 7107, United Mine Workers of America, District 28 v. Clinchfield Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Varela v. AE Liquidation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Ohlsen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
- Czyzewski v. Jevic Transportation, Inc. (In re Jevic Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Zilm v. Roberts (In re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2014
- Richards v. Advanced Accessory System, LLC (In Re Advanced Accessory System, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.