Richards v. Advanced Accessory System, LLC (In Re Advanced Accessory System, LLC)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MARCI B. McIVOR, Bankruptcy Judge.
For the reasons set forth in this Opinion, this Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, DENIES Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment, and DISMISSES Plaintiffs’ Complaint. This Court finds that Defendant was entitled to the “unforeseeable business circumstances” exception to the WARN Act and, therefore, the notice given by Defendant regarding Defendant’s plant closings was sufficient notice.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs were all employed…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Loehrer v. Mcdonnell Douglas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Jones v. Kayser-Roth Hosiery, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Czyzewski v. Jevic Transportation, Inc. (In re Jevic Holding Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2013
- Conn v. Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP (In re Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Varela v. Burtch (In re AE Liquidation, Inc.)District Court, D. Delaware · 2016
- Varela v. Eclipse Aviation Corp. (In re AE Liquidation, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Carlberg v. Guam Industrial Services dba Guam ShipyardDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.