Legal Opinion

Wright v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1946No. 34,120PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff, a boy about five and one-half years old, brings this action by his father as his natural guardian to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as the result of defendant’s alleged negligence. Defendant had a verdict. Plaintiff appeals.

There are numerous assignments of error challenging the regularity of the proceedings below and the correctness of the charge in defining the rights and liabilities of. the parties. Because we think that there must be a reversal for the reason that the charge was erroneous and because we think that the alleged irregularities…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Fort Wayne & Chicago Railway Co. v. CallaghanIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Casto v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Bimberg v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Levasseur v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  5. Rintala v. Duluth, Winnipeg & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. LeMay v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  3. Seitzer v. HalversonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Halloran v. TousignantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Nygren v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API